On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 1:34 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
> On 1/31/2018 6:15 PM, Chris Barker wrote: > > I still have no idea why there is such resistance to this [spelling >> corrected] >> > > M.-A. Lemburg already summarized his view of the specifics for this > issue. And see below. Thanks for that, I know I phrased it in no-very-open-for-discussion way, but that was what I was looking for. Frankly, I disagree with much of that, but it's been clearly layed out, which is what is needed to make a decision. > (I'm assuming the OP (or someone) will do all the actual work of coding >> and updating docs....) >> > > At least one core developer has to *volunteer* to review, likely edit or > request edits, merge, and *take responsibility* for the consequences of the > PR. Fair enough -- it would be quite reasonable to say that this (or anything) wont get included u less a core dev decides it worth his/her time to bring it in -- but that is different than saying it won't be brought in regardless. > I take this to mean that normal special cases are not special enough but > some special special cases are. The meta meaning is that decisions are not > mechanical and require tradeoffs, and that people will honestly disagree in > close cases. yup -- there seems to be much resistance, and not much support -- so I guess we're done. -CHB -- Christopher Barker, Ph.D. Oceanographer Emergency Response Division NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice 7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception chris.bar...@noaa.gov
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/