On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 10:56 PM, Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 2 March 2018 at 11:43, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> After dozens of posts and a wide variety of useful opinions and >> concerns being raised, here is the newest version of PEP 572 for your >> debating pleasure. > > This is a distinct improvement - thanks for incorporating the varied > feedback so well. > > I still remain -1, though. Reasons scattered through the other thread > but mostly relating to the fact that there are subtle differences > between statement-local names and other names in Python (notably that > you can't close over them). I don't think the benefits of the proposal > are sufficient to justify introducing a new > similar-but-subtly-different type of name.
That's fine :) I'm under no illusions that everyone will adore this proposal (hey, I'm no more than +0.5 on it myself). The greatest goal of this PEP is to record the arguments for and against each of the viable alternatives, as a long-term document. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
