On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 4:25 AM, Nathaniel Smith <n...@pobox.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 1:03 AM, Wes Turner <wes.tur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I added trio to the comparison table
> > (Things are mostly just async-wrapped,
> > though pathlib_not_trio does show a few missing methods?).
>
> trio.Path is an automatically generated, exact mirror of pathlib.Path,
> so I don't think it's very useful to have in your table? Also the
> missing attributes are actually handled via __getattr__, so they
> aren't actually missing, they're just invisible to your detection
> mechanism :-)
>
> In [21]: trio.Path("/a/b").anchor
> Out[21]: '/'
>
> In [22]: trio.Path("/a/b").name
> Out[22]: 'b'
>
Ah, good call. Didn't even look.
Is there a reason that the pathlib methods shouldn't just be similarly
async-wrapped?
>
> -n
>
> --
> Nathaniel J. Smith -- https://vorpus.org
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
