On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 1:00 PM, Thautwarm Zhao <yaoxiansa...@gmail.com> wrote: > I do support this feature, but now I'm worried about the meaning of ':=', it > seems to be a lazy assignment in some degree. I'm not sure using ':=' is > proper here.
What do you mean by "lazy"? The assignment happens at the exact point that it is reached. Is there another language that uses := to mean something where the assignment doesn't happen until later? Or where the expression is assigned unevaluated, and is evaluated later? What part of it is lazy? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/