On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 6:45 AM, Tim Peters <tim.pet...@gmail.com> wrote: > [Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>] >> So maybe the effective semantics should be: >> >> >>> (lambda a=3: (lambda b=a+1: (a, b))())() >> (3, 4) > > Almost, but by that point the idea that this is already "easily > spelled" via lambdas has become ludicrously difficult to argue with a > straight face ;-)
Oh, I dunno, I've seen people argue that PHP is the right choice of language :-) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
