On Tue, 15 May 2018 21:51:20 +1200 Greg Ewing <[email protected]> wrote: > Ethan Furman wrote: > > Part of the point of the proposal is to be able to use existing keywords > > (at least, I thought it was). > > Mainly it's so that *new* keywords can be added to the language > without breaking old code. Nobody is going to want to turn one > of the currently existing keywords into a name.
I'm a worried that we're speaking about making it *easier* to add new keywords. The language doesn't need a C++-like destiny, IMHO, where the language definition becomes increasingly bloated by piling up syntactical features. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
