On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:55 PM, Manuel Barkhau <mbark...@gmail.com> wrote:
> continue if not is_valid(elem)
how is this better than:
if not is_valid(elem):
But even if it is, that might be a consideration for a new language, but
adding it to python now is pretty darn unlikely.
> When there is an expression involved for the case of a `return`
> or `raise` statement, I don't think it's such a great style,
> because the conditional gets hidden off to the right.
now I"m confused -- if it's not a great sytle, why suggest it?
and I was thinking that the one good thing is that the "return" or "break"
is a bit more prominent -- which could be a good thing.
Alternatively, is there a good way I can implement this as a
> preprocessor for myself?
I'm pretty sure not -- python is very dynamic, but not let you redefine the
Other than as a import hook that re-wrote the code on the fly.
but really -- don't do that -- then no one else will understand your code.
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
Python-ideas mailing list
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/