v = get_something()
while v != INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL:
do_something(v)
v = get_something()
I'd personally go with:
while True:
v = get_something()
if v != INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL: break
do_something(v)
But it's not much different. I'd really like to be able to use jump
statements
in ternary expressions, like:
do_something(v)
But that's another story.
-- Carl Smith
carl.in...@gmail.com
On 21 May 2018 at 13:22, Juancarlo Añez <apal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> while ((v = get_something()) != INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL)
>> do_something(v);
>>
>
>
> The current pattern in Python would be something like:
>
> v = get_something()
>
> while v != INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL:
>
> do_something(v)
>
> v = get_something()
>
> With "as" allowed in "while", they pattern might be:
>
> while get_something() as v:
>
> if v == INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL:
>
> break
>
> do_something(v)
>
>
> The discussion isn't over, so it could also be:
>
> while (get_something() as v) != INCONVENIENT_SENTINEL:
>
> do_something(v)
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Juancarlo *Añez*
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
