On 2018-06-08 15:12, Randy Diaz wrote:
I think that the keyword do would solve problems that occur when people
want a simple way to run a command over an iterable but they dont want
to store the data.
example:
do print(x) for x in range(50)
---------
this above command will not return anything and will just run the
command that is underlined over a generator. thus running a command
comprehension or do comprehension. this will stop people from using the
list comprehension to run an iterable through a function when they dont
want to return anything. ( Specifically if memory is something we would
want to conserve, such as in multithreaded web applications. )
How is that better than:
for x in range(50): print(x)
(if you want it to be a single line)?
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
