On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:38 PM MRAB <pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > What if an object is not going to be shared, but instead "moved" from > one subinterpreter to another? The first subinterpreter would no longer > have a reference to the object. > > If the object's refcount is 1 and the object doesn't refer to any other > object, then copying would not be necessary.
Yeah, that's something that I'm sure we'll investigate at some point, but it's not part of the short-term plans. This belongs to a whole class of possibilities that we'll explore once we have the basic functionality established. :) FWIW, I don't think that "moving" an object like this would be to hard to implement. -eric _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
