I agree a class can provide a very good alternative to PEP505. I built one a while ago, and still use it https://github.com/klahnakoski/mo-dots for most my data transformation code.
The library only boxes dicts and lists, which removes the need for .unbox() in many of my use cases. My point is, if a class is chosen instead of PEP505, I doubt the unboxing will be a big issue. On 2018-07-23 11:12, David Mertz wrote: > Here is a way of solving the "deep attribute access to messy data" > problem that is: _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
