Hi James This is an attempt to respond to the issues that be lying behind your request for code blocks in Python. It's my two cents worth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_two_cents) of opinion.
I really do wish we could have language that had all of Ruby's strengths, and also all of Python's. That would be really nice. Quite something indeed. But most strengths, in another situation, can be a weakness. Language design is often a compromise between conciseness and readability, ease of use and performance, good for beginners and good for experts, and many other factors. Such as innovation and stability. Guido's decisions, as BDFL, have shaped Python and its community into what it is now. It is one set of compromises. Other languages, such as Ruby, have made different compromises. Now that the BDFL is on vacation, the challenge is to maintain the essence of Python while continuing to innovate. Python's compromises and implementation give the language a large sweet spot. === https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sweet_spot_(sports) The sweet spot is a place where a combination of factors results in a maximum response for a given amount of effort. === Languages do influence each other. Ruby is good at internal Domain Specific Languages (DSLs). And there's Perrotta's influential book on Ruby Metaprogramming. That's something I think Python could learn from. But I don't see any need (or even benefit) in adding new language features to Python, so it can do better at DSLs. It's fairly easy to write a decorator that turns a class into a dictionary of 'code blocks'. I think that might be what you really want. I'd be pleased to hear what you have to say about this. with best regards Jonathan _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
