Adding one operator is hard in Python. Adding 4 operators, just for the sake of a bit of syntaxic suggar for DSL based projects is never going to fly.
And I say that as a long time SQLA user. Le 03/08/2018 à 19:46, Todd a écrit : > Coming back to the previous discussion about a new set of overloadable > boolean operators [1], I have an idea for overloadable boolean operators > that I think might work. The idea would be to define four new operators > that take two inputs and return a boolean result based on them. This > behavior can be overridden in appropriate dunder methods. These > operators would have similar precedence to existing logical operators. > The operators would be: > > bNOT - boolean "not" > bAND - boolean "and" > bOR - boolean "or" > bXOR - boolean "xor" > > With corresponding dunder methods: > > __bNOT__ and _rbNOT__ (or __r_bNOT__) > __bAND__ and _rbAND__ (or __r_bAND__) > __bOR__ and _rbOR__ (or __r_bOR__) > __bXOR__ and _rbXOR__ (or __r_bXOR__) > > The basic idea is that the "b" is short for "boolean", and we change the > rest of the operator to upercase to avoid confusions with the existing > operators. I think these operators would be preferably to the proposals > so far (see [1] again) for a few reasons: _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
