[Chris Angelico] > Though... it's insignificant when the function header precedes the > expression/body. With the proposal to move the header to the end, that > might become problematic, which makes it yet another cost to the > proposal.
I don't think it would be a problem because, like ternary and other circuiting operations, the expression isn't evaluated until certain criteria are met. The arrangement shouldn't matter. ...I think. On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 10:10 PM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Abe Dillon <abedil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > [Chris Angelico] > >> > >> If you have a use-case for a lambda function that takes a callback and > >> has a default value for that callback, please submit it to The Daily > >> WTF. In Steve's example, the main function was created with a > >> statement. > > > > > > Fair enough, but I still think D'Aprano may have engineered his example > to > > be particularly unreadable. > > Why would you use 'arg' for both the argument to the method and the > > callback! That's at least a little WTF. > > True, but hardly significant. The one inside lambda is local to it. > > Though... it's insignificant when the function header precedes the > expression/body. With the proposal to move the header to the end, that > might become problematic, which makes it yet another cost to the > proposal. > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
