On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 at 13:43, Marko Ristin-Kaufmann <marko.ris...@gmail.com> wrote: > > P.S. My offer still stands: I would be very glad to annotate with contracts a > set of functions you deem representative (e.g., from a standard library or > from some widely used library). Then we can discuss how these contracts. It > would be an inaccurate estimate of the benefits of DbC in Python, but it's at > least better than no estimate. We can have as little as 10 functions for the > start. Hopefully a couple of other people would join, so then we can even see > what the variance of contracts would look like.
Our mails crossed in the ether, sorry. Pathlib. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
