I think the confusion would be minimal and not worth the hassle of renaming to pcontract. People would just say “Python icontract” when it’s ambiguous.
Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 1, 2018, at 3:28 AM, Marko Ristin-Kaufmann <marko.ris...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi Cameron, > A nerdy way to make it sound like a sentence: "I contract that ...". > > Pcontract would stand for python contract. Pycontract is already taken. > > Cheers, > Marko > >> Le lun. 1 oct. 2018 à 09:15, Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au> a écrit : >> On 01Oct2018 07:25, Marko Ristin-Kaufmann <marko.ris...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >I'd like to rename icontract into pcontract to avoid name conflict with >> >java's icontract library. >> > >> >Do you have any better suggestion? >> >> No, sounds ok to me. What was the "i" for in the old name? >> >> Cheers, >> Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-ideas mailing list >> Python-ideas@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
