Julien, Personally, I would be able to use the module you are proposing to accumulate arbitrarily-named measures. I can not think of a use case for division, but it would be nice for completion. I have made my own library that implements a small part of what you propose [1].
I was looking through the pstats.py [2] source code; and I thought it could benefit from vector operations. I have seen other code that collect measures have the same redundant pattern. Maybe some fancy regex can identify other += code sequences that would benefit. If you make a module, and show how it can simplify pstats.py, maybe you have a winner? [1] "vector" addition? - https://github.com/klahnakoski/mo-dots/blob/dev/tests/test_dot.py#L610 [2] pstats.py source code - https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/3.7/Lib/pstats.py#L156 On 2018-10-30 11:31, julien tayon wrote: > Hello :) > > the idea is described here: > http://jul.github.io/cv/pres.html#printable > > Summary of the idea : > > Take a linear algebrae book, and implements all the rules as a TDD. > https://github.com/jul/archery/blob/master/consistent_algebrae.py > > make it works based on abstract base class and sets of Mixins. > https://archery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ > > And see if we can make cos/__abs__/dot and if it gives naively the intended > results ? (spoiler: yes) > > Making it work with dict, and "other" dictionary like counter by using > ineritance > https://archery.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#advanced-usage > > My idea is : wouldn't it be nice if we introduced geometries as sets of > mixins for objects ? > (Hilbertian algebrae could be nice too, and we could make MutableMapping > behave like bra/kets). > > So I was proposing a soft discussion on : could we agree that it would be > nice to consider operation overloading as a whole set of behaviours that > could profit from being consistent in a categorized way ? (like the + of [] > could be the + of "RecordAlgebrae") > Meaning we could define sets of "expected behaviour consistent interaction > between operators" as we defined the abc and call them algebrae? > > I offer the LinearAlgebrae Mixins as a POC, and was thinking of creating a > unittest to qualify if an object is following the rules of linear algebrae. > > What are your opinions ? > I don't actually see a lot of use case except it was funny to build. But > maybe it can be of use. > > > Cordialement > > -- > Julien > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/