On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 03:22:27PM -0700, Paul Ferrell wrote: > Anecdotally, I showed the with/except example to my student (who's > relatively new to python), to see how he interpreted it. He (correctly?) > assumed the CM operations were within the 'try', and was pretty surprised > when I told him that the except part of the with wasn't actually valid > Python.
One of the more pernicious myths about language design is that if something surprises a beginner, it must be a bad idea. The reality is that beginners are the worst people to judge what is good or bad or consistent, because they don't have the knowledge or experience to recognise deep consistency or flaws in an feature. I'm just making a general observation here, not making a specific claim that this specific proposal is flawed (beyond the point I made earlier that it may be unnecessary and redundant). But anecdotes about "beginners were surprised by..." don't carry much weight with me. (Not "zero weight", it isn't as if I *want* to surprise beginners, and sometimes newcomers to a language can spot things which experts are so used to they don't notice any longer.) -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
