On 2/1/2019 9:07 AM, James Lu wrote:
I always use ptipython (ptpython shell over the ipython console) for
my REPLs. The built-in python repl is not /batteries included/ in the
sense that it already has what you need to explore the language.
I wonder, what do the python committers think about including a
stripped-down version of ipython and ptpython in the built-in python?
I'm opposed to it. I think the current situation is fine, where CPython
ships with a basic REPL, and other REPLs exist. I don't want to see any
complexity added to CPython. I'm not opposed to hooks to make it easier
for third parties to add functionality to the CPython REPL, but I'd have
to see how they complicate things before making up my mind.
Eric
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 6:15 AM Lele Gaifax <l...@metapensiero.it
<mailto:l...@metapensiero.it>> wrote:
Further magic comes with https://pypi.org/project/xonsh/
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
l...@metapensiero.it <mailto:l...@metapensiero.it> | --
Fortunato Depero, 1929.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org <mailto:Python-ideas@python.org>
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
