> On 19 Feb 2019, at 05:48, David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:
>
> You either have much better eyes to read tiny fonts than I do, or maybe a
> much larger monitor (it's hard for me to fit a 30"" monitor in my laptop bag).
>
> But that's not even the real issue. If the characters were in giant letters
> on billboards, I still would never want more than 80 of them on a line (well,
> rarely, I violate PEP 8 sometimes). Centuries if not millennia of experience
> with writing show that cognitive burden goes up exponentially, not linearly,
> as lines get to be more than about 60 characters.
If that is the issue then we should be talking about non-space characters, not
a 68 column limit right? No way does 40 spaces due to indent count towards the
cognitive burden :)
Also, if the cognitive burden is the issue then we should talk about short
forms for keyword arguments again. The way the 68 column limit works in
practice is that people avoid keyword arguments because of line length, plus
the issues already mentioned.
/ Anders
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
