On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:52:34PM -0800, Brett Cannon wrote: > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 6:23 AM Jimmy Girardet <i...@netc.fr> wrote: [...] > > I would be happy to have > > > > >>> [1,2,3].append(4)::sort()::max() +1 > > > > It makes things very easy to read: first create list, then append 4, > > then sort, then get the max. > > > > Easy for you, but not necessarily everyone else. For instance, I find the > explicit writing out of the lines easier.
That's possibly a matter of familiarity. I'd be very surprised if you preferred this: mystr = mystr.strip() mystr = mystr.expandtabs() mystr = mystr.lower() mystr = mystr.replace('ham', 'spam') result = function(mystr) over this fluent version: result = function(mystr.strip().expandtabs().lower().replace('ham', 'spam')) Or if you're worried about the line length: result = function(mystr.strip() .expandtabs() .lower() .replace('ham', 'spam') ) works for me. -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/