`dis` module was my only reference for this proposal. If majority doesn't want a new implementation-specific module, it is best to withdraw this proposal. Brett Cannon <br...@python.org>, 24 Nis 2019 Çar, 20:49 tarihinde şunu yazdı:
> Since bytecode is a CPython-specific implementaiton detail I don't know if > it makes sense to enshrine an assembler for it in the stdlib (if you were > to ask me today if I thought the dis module belonged in the stdlib I would > probably say "no", but I also know not everyone agrees with that view :) . > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:36 AM Batuhan Osman Taşkaya < > batuhanosmantask...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Currently it is hard to assemble cpython bytecode without help of 3rd >> party libraries (like: vstinner/bytecode). I'm proposing an assembler to >> standard library and an API to cpython's peephole optimizer. Also an >> interface like `ast.NodeVisitor` and `ast.NodeTransformer` for bytecode >> objects will may be handy. >> >> It would help if you are doing; >> - Runtime patching >> - Specific optimizations at bytecode level >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Python-ideas mailing list >> Python-ideas@python.org >> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas >> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >> >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
