On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 6:08 AM Franklin? Lee <leewangzhong+pyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The proposed feature is for expressing type relations, which only > matters when you care about types. The feature will only be useful > when you care about types. The syntax will only help/hurt readability > when the code cares about types. > And Python programmers rarely care about types -- that's why we use Python.d Much to my surprise, a lot more Python programmers are starting to care about static type checking, but that's, well, static, so also not relevant to this idea. I think we should be a bit careful about how we interpret discussion on this list -- I suspect that the amount of discussion is mostly about how interesting a topic is -- not how good an idea it is to actually include it in Python. -CHB > > -- Christopher Barker, PhD Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/EI7YCDMOB6YEXVQTRVITDLJUOWX4YJ7F/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
