On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 10:57 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote: > Maybe you'll persuade enough committers without examples. Maybe the > problem will be solved en passant if the "issubclass needs an > operator" thread succeeds (I've already suggested to Yanghao offlist > that Guido's suggested spelling of "<:" seems usable for "update", > even though in that thread it's a comparison operator). But both > would require a lot of luck IMO.
I must have overlooked it ... <: seems good to me. I do agree with you this needs more materialized evidence, I am working on it, in a few areas more than just DSL/HDL. For now I have abandoned my local change to cpython and settled with list assignment signal[:] = thing. This in most case does not conflict with numeric operations, nor list operations. (HDL signals are both numbers and a list of individual signals). And it aligns with what it means with the general python list. Though, I am really looking forward to the success of <: operator as well ;-) _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VB4ETTBFY24ENOFHS2JJAAM7PGQD6COA/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
