On Aug 29, 2019, at 04:58, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> 
> - quote marks are also used for function calls, but only a limited 
> subset of function calls (those which take a single string literal 
> argument).

This is a disingenuous argument.

When you read spam.eggs, of course you know that that means to call the 
__getattr__('eggs') method on spam. But do you actually read it as a special 
method calling syntax that’s restricted to taking a single string that must be 
an identifier as an argument, or do you read it as accessing the eggs member? 
Of course you read it as member access, not as a special restricted calling 
syntax (except in rare cases—e.g., you’re debugging a 
__getattribute__), because to do otherwise would be willfully obtuse to do so, 
and would actively impede your understanding of the code. And the same goes for 
lots of other cases, like [1:7].

And the same goes for regex"a.*b" or 1.23f as well. Of course you’ll know that 
under the covers that means something like calling 
__whatever_registry__['regex'] with the argument "a.*b", but you’re going to 
think of it as a regex object or a float object, not as a special restricted 
calling syntax, unless you want to actively impede your understanding of the 
code.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/JGDXZSDXGHFAHSPIS5MCKDDWJJ2WVOV2/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to