On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 at 14:58, Ricky Teachey <ri...@teachey.org> wrote:
> I like this idea. > > >> The ~foo for Optional is... not that obvious. Not sure it's a win. >> >> > I agree. Seems like `foo | None` is just as readable. Assuming that None > would be swapped out for NoneType, of course. > Agreed, `foo | None` is short and readable. There really is no need for special syntax for Optional. -- Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro Gambit Research "The universe is always one step beyond logic." -- Frank Herbert
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/VPDDUPNULDVXMKSR5KSAH53Q6HNUUBMC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
