On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 12:35:09AM -0300, Joao S. O. Bueno wrote: > Well - the idea showed up here, and got an immediate "that is nice, let's > do it" from you, followed by approval from a lot more people, and > very little controverse. So, it is pretty much "approved", even if not yet > detailed in an approved PEP.
As the PEP author, I don't consider it even close to approved. I'm still slowly working my way through the next draft of the PEP. There are lots of objections and unresolved questions: - is this feature necessary? - if so, should it be an operator, a dict method or a function? - if an operator, should it be spelled ``+`` or ``|`` or something else? - what precise behaviour should it have? At the time I wrote the first draft, there was no consensus that the feature was necessary, but most people who thought it would be useful agreed that ``+`` was the right operator. Since then, further discussion seemed to shift closer to consensus that the feature might be useful, but away from using ``+``. -- Steven _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OHKUFD4IU5IJTUPP2GKE2TGHSAORXL7C/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
