On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 5:56 PM Dino Viehland <dinoviehl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hm... But then you'd be paying for boxing/unboxing cost on each access. >> I'm actually okay with needing to use Cython if you're really that tight >> for space. >> >> > > Right, but those would be rather ephemeral vs more potentially long lived > members. It'll certainly depend upon the usage pattern whether or not it's > worth it. And the point of using __slots__ is that you've decided you're > tight on space but we don't force usage of Cython to go dict-free. > Well, I expect the implementation to be too hairy to bother. > But you could do that without the wacky API by just naming the slots _foo, >> _bar and have properties foo, bar. >> > > You can also just mutate the type after the fact and replace the > descriptor with the wrapped descriptor. Wouldn't the prefixed solution > work just as well for dataclasses in some form as well? > SOrry, I lost track of what you call "prefixed". -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) *Pronouns: he/him **(why is my pronoun here?)* <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/TNLPW2SMT2O665GM6IGKP3T4NKT3PZ2D/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
