On Oct 17, 2019, at 16:03, Steve Jorgensen <ste...@stevej.name> wrote: > > My thinking is that checking for type of `Struct` (or `Record` or whatever > name it has) is most useful in cases when the object is also identifiable as > a collection and is to disambiguate those that are primarily collections from > those that are not.
Can you give us an actual use case—some code that you have, or at least something you could reasonably want to write—where you need to distinguish something’s structy-ness, but have to work around it, so this feature would make your code better? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZIMK65NWNWZH6HB5I3V3L7UVR6OGKJ3S/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
