On Mon, 21 Oct 2019 at 14:55, David Mertz <me...@gnosis.cx> wrote:

> What is proposed in this PEP is to add a meaning for dct1+dct2 that would be 
> well defined, but that would be DIFFERENT from the "one obvious meaning."

For me, what's coming out is that there *is* no "obvious meaning".
People expect different things. All the attempts to persuade people
that they "should" expect something other than what they do is merely
symptomatic of the basic fact, that not everyone expects the same
thing from this operation.

Whether "in time, you'll learn the meaning that Python assigns to
dictionary +", and "the proposed meaning is useful in a number of
contexts" are sufficiently true to counterbalance the fact that people
assume different meanings when faced with the operator for the first
time, is a different question - and one that's much harder to answer.
But arguing over what's "obvious" in the face of people clearly
stating that they have differing initial assumptions, seems like a
waste of time to me. Let's just accept that the meaning of + on
dictionaries, as defined by the PEP, is something that *at least some
people* will not find immediately obvious, and will have to learn.

Personally, I think the utility is marginal, the "obviousness" is
context dependent, the inconsistencies with set union are a concern,
and the fact that there are already (admittedly more convoluted) ways
of doing this makes the proposal a minor win at best. So I'm probably
-0 on the PEP.

Paul

PS Yes, every programming language construct is unfamiliar to someone
completely new to programming. Yes, even keywords and method names are
unfamiliar to people who are not native English speakers. Both of
those points support my argument, so no-one should feel any particular
need to make them here ;-)
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/DAN3PM3H4FQWRBQKCNPZFEZS6KYJGFZ3/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to