Soni,

Others have explained it already. `python -m` expects a _module_ as
parameter, and that module is searched by the rules `import` follows under
`PYTHONPATH`.

What you're asking for is that `python` sets `PYTHONPATH` before executing
a module. Maybe another option to `python`?

python -p /path/to -m foo


I would agree that would be nice.



On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 6:07 PM Soni L. <fakedme...@gmail.com> wrote:

> why are we allowed to have fancy `python /path/to/foo.py` but not fancy
> `python -m /path/to/foo`? if `python` was capable of detecting modules and
> automatically deciding package roots, none of this would even be an
> argument and I'd just use `python /path/to/module/submodule/__main__.py`
> (with "module" having an __init__.py) and be done with it. but python can't
> do that because backwards compatibility and whatnot.
>
> so I propose we shove the solution into python -m instead. why's that so
> bad? it's simply ergonomics.
>
> On 2020-01-11 6:28 p.m., Juancarlo Añez wrote:
>
> Soni,
>
> Perhaps what you're looking for is available by writing a short Python
> program with a shebang? Then PYTHONPATH would be set to the directory of
> the program (many small projects include a `run.py` in the project's base
> directory).
>
> You can also place the program in ~/bin if it does `export PYTHONPATH`.
>
> Then, I have this alias for one of my home-brewed tools, and it works as I
> want:
>
> alias chubby='PYTHONPATH=~/chubby ~/.virtualenvs/chubby/bin/python -Oum
> chubby'
>
>
> I too think that the semantics of `python -m` are fine.
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 1:46 PM Soni L. <fakedme...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just want python foo/bar/baz/qux/__main__.py but with imports that
>> actually work. -m works, but requires you to cd. -m with path would be
>> an more than huge improvement.
>>
>> and it absolutely should look for the given module in the given path.
>> not "anywhere in the PYTHONPATH".
>>
>> On 2020-01-11 2:21 p.m., Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 11:27:51AM -0300, Soni L. wrote:
>> >
>> > > PYTHONPATH=foo/bar python -m baz.qux
>> > >
>> > > becomes
>> > >
>> > > python -m foo/bar/baz.qux
>> > >
>> > > which is less of a kludge.
>> >
>> > Sorry Soni, I completely disagree with you.
>> >
>> > The status quo `PYTHONPATH=foo/bar python -m baz.qux` is explicit about
>> > changing the PYTHONPATH and it uses a common, standard shell feature.
>> > This takes two well-designed components that work well, and can be
>> > understood in isolation, and plugging them together. The first part of
>> > the command explicitly sets the PYTHONPATH, the second part of the
>> > command searches the PYTHONPATH for the named module.
>> >
>> > Far from being a kludge, I think this is elegant, effective design.
>> >
>> > It seems to me that your proposed syntax is the kludge: it mixes
>> > pathnames and module identifiers into a complex, potentially
>> > ambiguous "half path, half module spec" hybrid:
>> >
>> >      foo/bar/baz.qux
>> >      * foo/bar/ is a pathname
>> >      * baz.qux is a fully-qualified module identifier, not a file name
>> >
>> > The reader has to read that and remember that even though it looks
>> > exactly like a pathname, it isn't, it does not refer to the file
>> > "baz.qux" in directory "foo/bar/". It means:
>> >
>> > * temporarily add "foo/bar/" to the PYTHONPATH
>> > * find package "baz" (which could be anywhere in the PYTHONPATH)
>> > * run the module baz.qux (which might not be qux.py)
>> >
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
>> Message archived at
>> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/L7RRKAML6GWYXN4ULLD3U2ZOLS6CC4HM/
>> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>>
>
>
> --
> Juancarlo *Añez*
>
>
>

-- 
Juancarlo *Añez*
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OSLZNG5JFZV3N7Y5C4TG35KQUUZNO2A2/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to