(Belatedly) Is anyone else interested in implementing this small feature for concurrent.futures?
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 18:28 Miguel Ángel Prosper < miguelangel.pros...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It looks like you have a good handle on the code -- do you want to > submit a PR to GitHub to add such a parameter? > > Thanks, but I'm not really sure how to implement it in the > ProcessPoolExecutor, I just think the solution is probably related to the > code responsible of handling a failed initializer (since they do very > similar things). On the ThreadPoolExecutor maybe I could, but I haven't > really checked for side effects or weird things. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/FGTSBGTXW63SSXFQBASLCTXAT4M6RGGN/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ > -- --Guido (mobile)
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WSE2KMKFMPG2RYSJSGMRZPDJLM7DZKSG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
