> You might be able to avoid calling the method twice using the walrus
operator.
I specifically discussed the walrus operator solution, but both you and Dominik
Vilsmeier seem to have missed that.
> I'd use the list constructor with a
> named function anyway, rather than inlining it in a comprehension. I
> consider that more readable.
I'm curious, how do you find this:
def clean():
for line in lines:
line = line.strip()
if line:
yield line
clean_lines = list(clean())
more readable than this?
clean_lines = [
for line in lines:
line = line.strip()
if line:
yield line
]
It's not that I find my version particularly readable, but I don't see how it's
worse.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/UNMZTO7QGYD53SUWSFMGZEVUPEIOSAVF/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
