On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 16:57, Eric Wieser <wieser.eric+nu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> It looks like actually this can be be built as a function today:
>
> def move(name):
> return inspect.currentframe().f_back.f_locals.pop(name)
>
> Which works as follows, but it feels awkward to pass variable names by
> strings (and will confuse linters):
>
> >>> for v in itertools.combinations([1, 2, 3], 1):
> ... print(id(move("v")))
> 1718903397008
> 1718903397008
> 1718903397008
I'm both impressed and horrified by this :-)
Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/42KOI2RBK7PI4IAZZARAANKE5BIKL7KS/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
