On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 2:35 PM Dan Sommers < 2qdxy4rzwzuui...@potatochowder.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Apr 2020 10:50:29 -0700 > Brendan Barnwell <brenb...@brenbarn.net> wrote: > > > ... we must demand that the language itself be renamed to something > > less offensive and more accurate, such as > > ConvenientProgrammingLanguage ... > > ITYM convenient_programming_language. See PEP 8, Naming Conventions, > Method Names and Instance Variables (the language as we know it is an > instance of a convenient programming language).¹ > > ¹ https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0008/#id47 > I'm not so sure about that. Is it an instance or a subclass? Seems to me that the language specification would be a base class (maybe an abstract base class) and each implementation would subclass that with appropriate method overrides. In that case, ConvenientProgrammingLanguage would be correct by PEP 8 (or is that CPLEP 8 now?).
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/IIAY7JTQ2XL7KJYKPF2XFCFUTSZ2TONV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
