> I think ultimately the argument you want to make really is the > “enlightened laziness” one: there are lots of optional Pandas-y parameters > in your superclass(es), and most of them you will definitely never care > about, but a few of them you actually might occasionally care about. What > then? Well, if your Y class is part of mission-critical interface code that > lives depend on, you probably do need to work out which those are and get > them nicely documented and statically checkable, but in a lot of cases it > isn’t nearly worth that much effort—just make Y pass everything through, > and the couple places you end up needing to pass down one of those Pandas-y > arguments you just do so, and it works, and that’s fine. >
Concur 100% thanks for saying it in a way that makes sense.
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LTAC5P6GH4TCBRY7YP2RYKUSVP3RIA5F/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
