On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 1:04 PM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > The rush to push this to a PEP is unseemly. This has only been two > days and I am sure that there will be many people who could be > interested but haven't had a chance to look at the thread yet due to > other committments. >
All the more reason to have a coherent document. There've been a number of different syntaxes proposed, and a number of objections, some to the specific syntaxes and some to the proposal as a whole, and it's unclear at times which is which. If someone's going to catch up on the thread after a delay, wouldn't it be far better to simply read a PEP than to try to delve through the entire thread and figure out which parts to reply to? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WU6MXERQ7PJUBC76LNM445DQKY37T3JU/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
