On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 1:04 PM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>
> The rush to push this to a PEP is unseemly. This has only been two
> days and I am sure that there will be many people who could be
> interested but haven't had a chance to look at the thread yet due to
> other committments.
>

All the more reason to have a coherent document. There've been a
number of different syntaxes proposed, and a number of objections,
some to the specific syntaxes and some to the proposal as a whole, and
it's unclear at times which is which. If someone's going to catch up
on the thread after a delay, wouldn't it be far better to simply read
a PEP than to try to delve through the entire thread and figure out
which parts to reply to?

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/WU6MXERQ7PJUBC76LNM445DQKY37T3JU/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to