> On Apr 24, 2020, at 08:46, Soni L. <fakedme...@gmail.com> wrote: > > it's not my own use case for once. the PEP clearly lists a use-case. we > should support that use-case.
So your use case is the rationale from a PEP written because Barry “can’t resist” and rejected as a joke in record time, for which a better solution was already added (use 0 for the environment variable) 3 years ago. And you ended your email with this code snippet: >>>> NoneType > Traceback (most recent call last): > File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module> > NameError: name 'NoneType' is not defined … which demonstrates that even if you had a real need for a PYTHON_BREAKPOINT=noop, your proposal wouldn’t have helped anyway. There is actually a way you could pass it, but if you don’t know that way, and felt the need to show us that you don’t know it, that can’t be your use case. And even after you figure it out, it would hardly be any more obvious to other people who need a noop function where to go digging for it than it was for you. _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/AHQX44DL2GRLDNOBCRMXG62LP7BADA7V/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
