>> Edwin Zimmerman wrote: Only if your workload is CPU bound. Python optimizes IO bound workload performance by releasing the GIL while doing IO. Green threads generally do not offer this option.
Real threads is not needed in Python: 1) Real threads do not work parallel 2) Real threads only consume resources of OS 3) Real threads have also as trade off context switching between threads (small but ...) I think considering this trade offs we should switch Real Thread -> Green Thread internally or provide alternative functionality ... I think asyncio already provide functionality of GreenThread ... Okay maybe we should leave Real Threads as it is ... I need to think about it ... But also in my email I have mentioned about `interpreters.run_string` @Edwin Zimmerman Do you know if it is blocking call ? And if yes than I do not understand how with such API we will have TRUE Parallel execution, because in this case only one Thread at the same time could be executed, but those threads could be executed only one at the time !! Also there are drawback that we need additional thread for run sub-interpretter !! Better would be the something like this in addition `interpreters.run_string_async`, `interpreters.run_async` in addition to `interpreters.run_string`, `interpreters.run` to remove trad offs _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/SZKLGCO6XYDTGQKXGQLLKJAEE7XMM3NW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
