On 14/06/20 1:42 pm, Chris Angelico wrote:
Hmm, I think I see what you mean. So awaiting it would be "spam(123)"
No, it would still be "await spam(123)". It's just that you wouldn't be able to separate the await from the call, so this wouldn't be allowed: a = spam(123) await a Incidentally, I think that "async" and "await" are terrible names for what they represent. In my idea they were spelled "codef" and "cocall". But we seem to be stuck with async/await now. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/QRS62ER3XDKZ3K2DDPTIBR6IPESLU7Q3/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
