Chris Angelico, you have a good point. An alternative solution that would achieve similar or even better results in terms of simplification would be not creating `fun` as a keyword and allowing developers to create functions in Python without a keyword (like in C-family). That way, a new proposal would be changing:
>>> from typing import Callable >>> def x(method: Callable[[int, dict], None]) -> None: ... pass ... >>> type(x) <class 'function'> Into this: >>> x(method: fun[int, dict] -> None) -> None: ... pass ... >>> type(x) <class 'fun'> What do you think? _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/3HCJABK5B3BGIJMHKQ5TQOANCLOAAYGG/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
