On 7/21/2020 2:54 PM, Alex Hall wrote:
It should do the import for you. As was proposed:
```
print(f"My dict: {d!p}")
```
should be equivalent to
```
import pprint
print(f"My dict: {pprint.pformat(d)}")
```
The import should happen in the same scope. Modifying the global
namespace could be confusing.
A quick test shows that adding `import pprint` to
`pprint.pformat({1:2})` slows things down by about 4% on my machine,
which I don't think is worth being concerned about. If the dict has
100 elements, the difference becomes too small to measure.
My first instinct is that monkeypatching the pprint module should
affect !p, but I see that monkeypatching builtins.repr doesn't affect
!r, so I'm not sure.
f-strings call PyObject_Repr directly, without going through builtins.
If we added !p as described here, we'd need to call import every time we
execute !p, because we don't know if it's been imported yet. At runtime,
we'd call "pformat()" via sys.modules['pprint'] after the import. That
could of course be monkey patched.
But I'm still not sure this is a good idea. I can't find the issue on
bpo where this was mentioned, but some of the issues that spring to mind
are:
- Most pprint output is multi-line. Is that a good thing with f-strings?
- How to handle parameters to pprint.pformat()?
- Is pprint.pformat() extensible enough? Can an object control how it is
pretty printed?
I'm sure there are others. As I've said before, I'd prefer a revamped
"pretty formatting" library, probably using singledispatch for
extensibility. But even with that, issues like parameterizing the output
remain.
Eric
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:04 PM Rob Cliffe via Python-ideas
<python-ideas@python.org <mailto:python-ideas@python.org>> wrote:
That seems like a nice idea, but what would happen if pprint had not
been imported? NameError?
Rob Cliffe
On 16/07/2020 05:34, Charles Machalow wrote:
> Right now in str.format(), we have !s, !r, and !a to allow us to
call str(), repr(), and ascii() respectively on the given expression.
>
> I'm proposing that we add a !p conversion to have
pprint.pformat() be called to convert the given expression to a
'pretty' string.
>
> Calling
> ```
> print(f"My dict: {d!p}")
> ```
>
> is a lot more concise than:
>
> ```
> import pprint
> print(f"My dict: {pprint.pformat(d)}")
> ```
>
> We may even be able to have a static attribute stored to change
the various default kwargs of pprint.pformat().
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/UUZLIVS67PU552IMRNP6JBNC5LHACVQ2/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/I5PLO5FUYMX45EXEENZF56PAPYJBC7QM/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
