My suggestion to solve this would be to use a similar rule to the walrus operator; only allow slice literals within either `()` brackets or `[]` square brackets; thus `{a: b: c: d, x: y}` becomes illegal and would need to be `{(a:b): (c:d), x: y}` _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/5YOUH4F56IKGUPRAKDO46BUVVXVOW7Z4/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
- [Python-ideas] PEP 472 - slices in keyword indices, d[x... Todd
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword ind... Christopher Barker
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword... Random832
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in key... Christopher Barker
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in... Chris Angelico
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in key... Alex Hall
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in... Paul Moore
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in... Steven D'Aprano
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slic... tcphone93
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword... Todd
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in key... Jonathan Fine
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in... Todd
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slic... Jonathan Fine
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword... David Mertz
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword... Steven D'Aprano
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword ind... Sebastian Kreft
- [Python-ideas] Re: PEP 472 - slices in keyword... Christopher Barker