On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 9:20 PM Ricky Teachey <ri...@teachey.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 9:06 PM Ricky Teachey <ri...@teachey.org> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020, 8:35 PM Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 4:57 PM Greg Ewing <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/09/20 2:24 am, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>> > On Sun, Aug 30, 2020 at 05:49:50PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>>> >> On 30/08/20 3:06 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>>>> >>> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:13:38PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> a[17, 42]
>>>> >>>> a[time = 17, money = 42]
>>>> >>>> a[money = 42, time = 17]
>>>> >
>>>
>>> I agree it's a fine use case. Using the currently prevailing proposal
>>> (which I steadfastly will refer to as "Steven's proposal") it's quite
>>> possible to implement this.
>>>
>>
>>> --
>>> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
>>>
>>
>> Can someone tell me...
>>
>
>> Is this right? Wrong? The hard way? The slow way?
>>
>
> ...Still not sure if that is right.
>
Actually I suppose this is the best way to do it:
def _real_signature(time, money): ...
class C:
def __getitem__(self, key, **kwargs):
try:
_real_signature(*key, **kwargs)
except TypeError:
try:
_real_signature(key, **kwargs)
except TypeError:
raise TypeError() from None
Sorry for all the replies but I'm honestly very unsure how do this
correctly under Steven's proposal.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/MSENNTHMJSU25NOZ5TJ3S2S2VZHQWYRF/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
