On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 07:12:37PM +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: > On 21/09/20 6:59 pm, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:26:45AM +0400, Abdur-Rahmaan Janhangeer wrote: > > > I am thinking of proposing to name accepted PEPs as PAPs > > > namely: Python Accepted Proposals. > > There's precedent for *not* doing that kind of thing. > "RFC" stands for "Request For Comment", and it stays that > way long after it has become adopted as a standard!
Indeed, I also first thought about RFCs and how they remain being called RFCs. I see no reason why we should think about changing PEPs. > Maybe posts to the Python lists could be passed through a > filter that looks for PEP references and adds information to > them. > > E.g. if someone typed "PEP 9876" into a post it might get > replaced by "PEP 9876 - Add turboencabulation module to stdlib > (Rejected)". This is an interesting thought. I wonder how hard this would be to implement in practice. - DLD -- David Lowry-Duda <da...@lowryduda.com> <davidlowryduda.com> _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/B6JQWSI2FLT4426P6HHUJRKAQBGSRRP4/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
