On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 10:18, Marco Sulla <marco.sulla.pyt...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Oct 2020 at 09:39, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
>>
>> Using PEP 634 syntax, I could write:
>>
>>
>> def method(self, **kwargs):
>> {'spam': spam, 'eggs': eggs, **kw} = **kwargs
>> process(spam, eggs)
>> super().method(**kw)
>
>
> I like that.
Comparing it to the pattern matching version Steven showed just before
this in his post, I don't see enough additional benefit over the
pattern matching version to justify needing a second way to do it. So
I'd say this is covered just fine by pattern matching, and there's no
need for a dict unpacking syntax as well. (Yes, I know we'll have list
patterns and list unpacking, and I don't advocate removing list
unpacking because there's a pattern matching variant. But we've lived
without dict unpacking for a long time, so unlike lists I think the
pattern matching version is enough).
Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ITHD27VMM75UCMGNGKN4TNNZ666PVNTJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
