On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 5:21 AM Neil Girdhar <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've seen this proposed here before. The general idea is that some iterator > transformations (like enumerate) should return sequences when they're applied > to sequences. I think it's good idea, but it adds complexity and work, which > I guess needs to be justified on a case-by-case basis. > > In short, this has nothing to do with reversed. If you made enumerate return > a sequence when its input is a sequence, you would also be able to do > enumerate(some_list)[34], which could also be useful. I think it makes > Python slightly more perfect and more beautiful. >
list(enumerate(some_list)) will give you a sequence, if that's what you want. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/WW3JHS234TJSXKUICY4PG2SPDTD3SBUP/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
