I think it is probably pointless now, but you might get more response if 
you post actual examples of the syntax and semantics, explaining how
your proposal differs from the (now accepted) alternative, and why you 
made the choices you did.

You should also consider that pattern matching is built on software 
patterns that are proven to actually be used. People *actually do* write 
code based on isinstance matches, tuple unpacking, etc., so it seems 
strange to want to avoid those patterns. 

But honestly, the window of opportunity has probably closed.

-- 
Steve
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/DB5ZF2UAEZHGVSE5FOMNXW7VTW4V634S/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to