My idea was that in the case of partial matching or full matching without 
passing the guard, the binding names has some sort of self destruction and 
return to the previous state. Using different variable names would resolve the 
issue and if I want to modify the global variables, I could choose to do so in 
the case block after the case succeeded. At least, this way, it would be more 
explicit, conveying the person intention (or forgetting if the original global 
value was later needed). I saw many people online talking about this the last 
couple of days so I thought I would bring it up here.  Any other syntax variant 
could be used to achieve the same thing. 
> On 13 Feb 2021, at 9:51 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> 
> The solution here is not to use the same name for two different concepts in 
> the first place. Python doesn't have scopes associated with blocks, only with 
> functions, and occasionally this means you have to pick your names carefully 
> -- the same happens e.g. if you reuse a variable as a for-loop control 
> variable.
> 
> You can say that you don't want failed cases to bind any variables -- but 
> what if the pattern succeeds and now a guard (the 'if' clause) needs to check 
> the variable? We went down the route of how to make this work and in the end 
> decided it would be too complicated.
> 
> Or what if a case succeeds, and then after the match statement is over and 
> done with (not in `case _:`) you still wanted access to the global 'name'? 
> The long and short of it is that match statements are liable to any or all 
> names bound in any of the patterns used, and your code is incorrect if you 
> aren't prepared for that.
> 
> A variant of the syntax to allow alternate semantics sounds worse.
> 
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:30 PM Abdulla Al Kathiri 
> <alkathiri.abdu...@gmail.com <mailto:alkathiri.abdu...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> I will explain it in the following few lines of code..
> 
> name = "George"
> year = 2021
> 
> d = {"name": "Mike", "year": 1919}
> 
> match d:
> 
>         case {"name": name, "year": 1917}:
>                 print("match 1 found”)
>                 # I want to remove binding "name" here from partial matching
> 
>         case {"year": year, "name": "Michael”}:
>                 print("match 2 found”)
>                 # I want to remove binding "year" here from partial matching. 
>                 # Basically removing all name bindings after every 
> partial/failed matching 
> 
>         case _:
>                 print("match not found!”)
>                 print(f"{name = }, {year = }”)
> 
> ### Output ###: 
> match not found!
> name = 'Mike', year = 1919
> 
> But I want :var: 'name' to stay being the global name “George" and :var: 
> 'year' being the global year 2021 if an exact matching is not found.
> 
> Maybe it is done the way it is for speed optimization (overhead reduction or 
> something), but what if I don't care about speed and I care about having no 
> un-intentional side-effects? 
> 
> Can we do something like the following to solve this issue?
> match d, partial_binding=False:
>         case … : ...
>         case … : ...
> with partial_binding=True by default.
> 
> Any other idea in how to prevent name binding due to partial matching from 
> happening? Any previous discussions on this? 
> 
> Thanks, 
> 
> Abdulla
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org 
> <mailto:python-ideas@python.org>
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org 
> <mailto:python-ideas-le...@python.org>
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ 
> <https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/>
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/HOFNVZ6KJA6SHCE4NCLPSK27XLDMK7VR/
>  
> <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/HOFNVZ6KJA6SHCE4NCLPSK27XLDMK7VR/>
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ 
> <http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/>
> 
> 
> -- 
> --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido <http://python.org/~guido>)
> Pronouns: he/him (why is my pronoun here?) 
> <http://feministing.com/2015/02/03/how-using-they-as-a-singular-pronoun-can-change-the-world/>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/7L5KOHIIVN5K2LJLWFOUBYB4OXHXQ4AJ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to