On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 5:26 AM Stephen J. Turnbull
<turnbull.stephen...@u.tsukuba.ac.jp> wrote:
>
> Alexandre Brault writes:
>  > On 2021-04-03 12:07 a.m., John wrote:
>
>  > >> Visually this means I can identify each particular operation and its
>  > >> relationship with the next term, then ignore it (visually track parts
>  > >> that no longer matter for understanding the equation) and look at the
>  > >> next parts:
>  > >>
>  > >> 1: b c f + d % e * g h - 2 / ** /
>  > >> 2: b ____ d % e * g h - 2 / ** /
>  > >> 3: b ________ e * g h - 2 / ** /
>  > >> 4: b ___________ g h - 2 / ** /
>  > >> 5: b ___________ ___ 2 / ** /
>  > >> 6: b [___________ _____ **] /
>  > >>
>  > >> Along the way, I've understood each part, and its relationship with
>  > >> the rest of the computation.
>  > > b/((((c+f)%d)*e)**((g-h)/2)))
>
>  > Your very long postfix equation may or may not be more readable
>  > than the infix version with parentheses, but I'd argue that neither
>  > is more readable than a version decomposed in bite-sized operations
>  > over multiple statements, each using a self-documenting variable
>  > name. That, to me, is much more readable and fits much more within
>  > the philosophy of Python code
>
> +1 That was my immediate reaction, too:
>
> This is what temp variables like ____, ________, ___________, ___, and
> _____ are for!  Although I prefer giving them less opaque names. :-)
>

Helps, but does spread the information out.  It also requires finding
useful names, and there aren't always meaningful names for
intermediate steps.

> I do love RPN for calculations, dc >> bc any day IMO.  But for me, RPN
> is write-only.  The advantage is that I can frequently do the
> calculation twice in dc in the time it takes to do it once and verify
> correct formula and no typos in bc.

Interesting that people find it write-only.  I find it easier to
modify a complicated equation in RPN than algebraic because it's
easier to find precisely the part of the calculation I need and insert
the extra code.  I'd honestly been considering if we should have
taught RPN first to give students a way to parse complicated algebraic
equations by rewriting them in a less-opaque form, but quickly
realized you never encounter anything more complicated than
multiplying two polynomials in an educational setting..

>
> Steve
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at 
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/YIGJYPF73NRYHR5RYC6MBJELITORFK64/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/S5JZUDNG4WUWZT24NFZWCSEKCUZJJCMT/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to